Blog LOGIN SIGN UP SITEMAP KOREAN
CFE Viewpoint
Read our Blog Here!
Videos
Contributions
Opinion Board
Opinion Leaders` Digest
Executive Essay
Popular : lartigue,eco..
:: Home > Opinions > CFE Viewpoint
CFE Viewpoint
The fact that prosperity exists where liberalism and free market principles are
firmly in place has been confirmed through an abundance of historical evidence.
237 

Buffett Tax and Grand National Party [3]

• Kim Young-yong | 2012-03-16 | Hits : 778
A group of young lawmakers from the Grand National Party has proposed the so-called "Buffett tax." They argue that the wealth tax will help the ruling party rid its image of being a "party for the rich" while promoting tax equity and reducing wealth inequality. But how much more should high-income earners pay in taxes to achieve tax equity? They already pay a large percentage of taxes, with about half of taxpayers exempted from paying income taxes. Equality through government-imposed transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor is the worst choice. The best solution is to boost economic growth. Politicians are easily tempted to please the voters with populist ideas but they should remember that a sound policy based on common sense is the best way to lead the nation.

* * *

Recent actions by lawmakers raise doubts about whether the National Assembly exists to promote the national interest or to be a human chess match. Most opposition party members are strongly opposed to the ratification of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement—yes, the same deal that they supported a few years ago. The ruling Saenuri Party, which also recently changed its name from GNP, proposed to create another layer at the top of the income bracket, the so-called "Buffett tax," after losing the Seoul mayoral election to an independent civic activist in October.

To take off the image of a party for the rich?

The purpose is not clear. The ruling party says it is to change its image as being the party of the rich. The image has been created due to the party's constant blundering, inconsistency and incompetence, not by a certain policy introduced only for wealthy people. They gave up a tax cut plan as opposition parties blamed it as a blatant move benefitting only the rich.

If the government cuts taxes to boost consumption and economic growth, it is unreasonable to exclude the rich from the list as they are the ones who pay most of the taxes. With about half of taxpayers entirely exempted from income taxes, the opposition parties are misleading us when they charge "tax cut for the rich." The ruling party failed to persuade the public of the need for a tax cut and now proposes a Buffett tax to change its image.

CFE Research Fellow Aaron McKenzie recently noted that American journalist H.L. Mencken once wrote: If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner. In the case of the ruling party, it will put the rich on the menu for hungry voters.

The wealth tax is losing ground around the world. Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Denmark scrapped the system as they found it ineffective. Finland and Sweden, both well-known as being welfare states, abolished the wealth tax in 2005 and 2007, respectively. That's not to argue we must follow them blindly. If we have a need, we should introduce a new tax. But the proponents of a wealth tax for Korea argue that it will improve tax equity and help resolve inequality and the wealth gap.

How much more should the rich pay for tax equity?

Their cases cannot be justified. High-income earners pay most of the taxes and more than half of taxpayers are not subject to income tax. It is hard to find a fair yardstick to say how much rich people should pay to achieve tax equity. The best solution to problems of inequality and the wealth gap is to boost economic growth. Equality through the transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor is the worst choice. Unless we believe the rich are fools, we should expect them to move their money abroad and to cut investment here to avoid heavy taxes. Wealth will be compromised for equity.

It is more of a socialist idea to impose heavy taxes on high-income earners in order to address inequality. The nation is heading toward it on many issues. Half-priced college tuition and the free school lunch program are prime examples. They are a real challenge for Korea. The ruling party should be wary of socialist and populist ideas and set the course for the entire country. But it is now dropping its traditional conservatism and is now even proposing expanding welfare and imposing a welfare tax.

Sound policy is the best way to take the power

A major problem with leftist policies is that they often end up with contradictory outcomes. Such policies deny or ignore property rights and weaken the ability of individuals to live their lives independently.

It is understandable that politicians are obsessed with counting votes. The real issue is how to win votes—proposing contradictory policies means keeping promises will necessarily lead to contradictions. Both the ruling and opposition parties should realize that the best way to win political office is create a sound policy based on common sense for the sake of the national interest.

By Kim Young-yong, professor of economics at Chonnam National University

  List
• Replies (3 )
* Johannes Goz(2012-04-22 21:17:24) [X]
The exemplary welfare states you mentioned all retain other forms of tax/fines that make the rich pay more and thus the government is able to run its welfare programs efficiently. A progressive tax is essential for a state to run its welfare programs and on the last note, I would like to emphasize that supporting a certain socialist view does not make a person directly a socialist.
Thank you very much for your time and please, if I have misunderstood your argument or if you find my arguments erroneous, weak or even irrelevant, send me an Email.

Johannes Goz
* Johannes Goz(2012-04-22 21:17:20) [X]
They realized that the wealth they have is more than enough for them to live their lives. The 51 of them calculated that if they donate 5% of their wealth to the government for two years, 100 billion Euros can be used solely on social welfare. These kind of people with that kind of mindset makes wealth tax unnecessary in Germany. Lets move to Finland. Yes they too have abandoned the system. However, when the Finish legislatures voted against the wealth tax system, it did not mean they were going to abandon the idea of taxing the rich more than the middle/low class. In 2004, an heir to a sausage factory empire was caught driving 80km/h in a 40km/h zone. In Finland, the fine is not absolute but relative, depending on your last year`s income. So the rich have to pay more than the less affluent. The 27 year old heir ended up with a 140,000 euro ticket.
* Johannes Goz(2012-04-22 21:00:33) [X]
With all due respect sir, I have been baffled by your words. You have mentioned that "It is more of a socialist idea to impose heavy taxes on high-income earners in order to address inequality". I understand that our country has rather bitter and unforgettable past due to communism and socialism but certain aspects of the theory is beneficial to the society, especially when it comes to social welfare. I am sincerely hoping that you are not dismissing these ideas just because they are from a socialist origin. Let me remind you that Germany, the world famous welfare state you mentioned above, is led by a social democratic party, a group of socialists.
Further more, you have mentioned that Germany, Sweden, Finland and other European states as examples of welfare states that abandoned the wealth tax system. True, but under different circumstances. In Germany 2009, for example, a group of millionaires and billionaires gathered and agreed to donate their wealth to the state.
Password : [OK]
Full name : Password :
OK ( 0 / 1,000 characters )
Total : 241 ( 1 / 17pages)
No. Title Writer Date Hits
241 `Common Sense" on North Korea (Korea Times) by Casey La.. Casey Lartigue Jr. 2012-04-02 1,237
240 Helping North Koreans `strike the blow` (Korea Times) Casey Lartigue Jr. 2012-03-22 1,361
239 Reckless lawmakers [1]kim In-Young 2012-03-19 825
238 Unionized teachers Kim Jung-rae 2012-03-16 796
237 Buffett Tax and Grand National Party [3]Kim Young-yong 2012-03-16 779
236 What is ISD? Song Won-keun 2012-03-16 949
235 Mything the Point on Sweden (Korea Times) Casey Lartigue Jr. 2012-03-14 968
234 Freedmen from North Korea (Korea Times) Casey Lartigue Jr. 2012-03-04 1,235
233 Nurturing SMEs & Fostering a Welfare State: How Much Can.. Aaron McKenzie 2012-02-15 862
232 Love vs. economics on Valentine's Day (Korea Times) [2]Casey Lartigue Jr. 2012-02-13 1,282
231 Steve Jobs on benefits of competition in education (Korea He.. [4]Casey Lartigue Jr. 2012-01-30 1,149
230 `Intellectual Shock` in Seoul (Korea Times) [2]Casey Lartigue Jr. 2012-01-20 853
229 No reason to delay the ratification of the Korea-U.S. FTA Cho Dong-keun 2012-01-10 569
228 Liberal democracy versus democracy: Can we live in a democra..   Min Kyung-kuk 2012-01-03 720
227 Is Hanjin Heavy a state-run company?   Park Dong Un 2012-01-03 670
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
list
Mail to Webmaster